Measuring how many validators it takes to stop Solana.
Consensus halts if validators holding more than a third of stake go offline, and can be controlled with two thirds. This board counts how few validators reach those lines, what they charge, and who is falling behind. Updated every two minutes from on-chain vote accounts.
Cumulative stake curve
Validators ranked from largest to smallest stake (log scale). Where the curve crosses each line is the number of operators needed to reach it.
Commission distribution
What validators keep from staking rewards. Count of validators versus the share of stake they hold. Validators at 100% are usually exchange or private nodes that keep all rewards for their own stake, which pulls the stake-weighted average up.
Above 10% commission
Largest validators charging more than 10%.
| # | Validator | Stake | Fee |
|---|
Largest validators
Shaded rows together pass one third of all stake. Vote lag is how many slots behind the tip each validator's latest vote is.
| # | Validator | Stake (SOL) | Share | Fee | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading… | ||||||
Delinquent validators
Staked validators that have stopped voting recently. Their stake earns nothing until they recover.
| # | Validator | Stake (SOL) | Share | Slots behind |
|---|
The 33% line
Solana needs more than two thirds of stake voting to finalize blocks. If operators controlling over a third stop, the chain stalls. A higher count means a more resilient network.
The 66% line
With two thirds of stake, a coordinated group could finalize blocks on its own. This number is the practical ceiling on collusion risk.
Caveats
One operator can run several validators, and stake pools spread deposits across many. True concentration is usually higher than per-validator numbers show.